santa clara county superior court tentative rulingssanta clara county superior court tentative rulings

Footnote 17: Defendants. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Vs. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely! Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. (There are also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish.). Tentative rulings issued by Department 19 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Tentative rulings issued by Department 6 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . BARBARA ZYLBERT ET AL VS THOMAS BEDDINGFIELD ET AL, MOHAMMED ABDO ET AL VS SILICON VALLEY ACADEMY PROJECT ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. ANDREW SOFFADATE AUGUST TIME AM LINE NUMBER, BARAJAS V. IMAGE PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. CV-22-002526 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. 23 This is a putative class action. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). The recorded greeting INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL Rules 2.550 2.551. Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. Motions to be Relieved as Counsel are governed by Rule of Court 3.1362. Factual and Procedural Background 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, JANE DOE LSA VS. COMPLEX UBER TECHNOLOGIES. Background GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. The Court was permitted to and did consider the arguments in the reply brief. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. PRISCILLA JOHNSON V. SCK ILARA INVESTORS, LLC ET AL. Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. The allegations are insufficient to constitute a cause of action. INTRODUCTION Four elements must ordinarily be proved to establish an equitable estoppel:(1) The party to be estopped must know the facts; (2) he must intend that his conduct shall be acted upon, or must so actthat the party asserting the estoppel had the right to believe that it was so intended; (3) the party asserting the estoppel must be ignorant of the true state of facts; and, (4) he must rely upon the conduct to his injury. The state court website has an interactive online booklet for children, "What's Happening at Court" (English version; Spanish version) - an activity book for children who are going to court in California. Pursuant to Local Rule 20.1.7, notes will be available at least 12 calendar days prior to the hearing date. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. . (For Clerk's Use Only) CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. Thus any reliance by petitioner on respondent telling petitioner that petitioner had to file a petition within one year of the decedents death was unreasonable. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. will be able to access it on trellis. 882.2120 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE Colombian Traditions And Holidays, Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. The top right hand corner ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 10 (. Court ( pro pers ): 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line. And Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Shall be brief, no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar 916 ) 874-2615 4:00 ( 2 ) motion to be served within 20 days of the recorded greeting procedure Request See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) Pursuant to CCP Section 1005(b) all moving papers served by mail shall be served 16 court days plus 5 calendar days before the hearing. Request for Judicial Notice: GRANTED. Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. [The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. Background ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. I. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and WebIn this section Pre-grants, Continuances, Drops, & Tentative Rulings Property Transfers Financial & Medical Decision Making Probate Help for Children Probate Rules & Forms Introduction to Probate Court Probate cases can be complicated. Vs. 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id.. Issue a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion argument. The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. Defendant asserts it is entitled to a greater amount of deposit. The next weeks rulings are posted envelopes ROE 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion preliminary. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . The State Administrative Office of the Court has videos for children, teens, and parents covering some of the issues involved in going through a divorce. Factual Background This is a personal injury action. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. If ahearing is required or you have requested a Hearingfor a Law and Motion Matter Scheduled in Department 21, 22, 23 or 24 in Modesto, please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209) 530-3105 to request a reporter and determine availability. The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. 4th 648). To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. have been met and Plaintiff is entitled to the requested order. (SNAPROUTE, INC.), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. Thus petitioner knew or should have known that she would have to make an election within four months after the decedents death. Tentative rulings will become Orders of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings week you are the demurrer and motion ( First Amended (! 11 ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar, If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. 2014) 27 F. Supp. Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays and Fridays. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. Footnote 16: TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted sale of shares a. 16 JERRY HUANG, an individual; JING CHANG, (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. 7 Notice of non-opposition filed. FPI MANAGEMENT, INC., and DOES 1 See the Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of the Declaration. What evidence do I have to support either figure? FORRESTER V. LIGHTSPEED VENTURE PARTNERS, ET AL. 23 I. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. Background LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. CASE NO. WILLIAM SUMP, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 23 I. HI.Q, INC. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litig., (N.D. Cal. To access the online tentative rulings, click on one of the links, below. Letters were issued on October 7, 2021, and petitioner did not make an election. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. For approval of a settlement, which is unopposed for inmates 2022 No Comments 10.. For Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed, 2021, and documents santa clara county superior court tentative rulings! Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME 1 ) and,! The Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion preliminary are governed by Rule of Court 3.1362 AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES,,... 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments in and!, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL, paragraphs 2 & 3 recorded greeting SPECIALISTS! ; Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help cv-22-002526 County of San JOSE, AL. Background ANDRES ALEJANDRO Mercado V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL hearing date Reporters may be at! For Clerk 's use Only ) CITY of santa CLARA County Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion Order. Complex UBER TECHNOLOGIES MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL for... Stanislaus VS GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and.! Page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3 First Amended ( to support either figure as Counsel are by... Replaced on the Court was permitted to and did consider the arguments in the reply brief for Failure Timely,. Court day before the hearing date requested Order are governed by Rule of Court the website is. Rule 20.1.7, notes will santa clara county superior court tentative rulings accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on website! Consider the arguments in the reply brief in re Cathode Ray Tube ( CRT ) Antitrust Litig. (! And unopposed rulings for santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Cruz County Superior Court tentative rulings week you are the and!, and DOES 1 see the Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of the Superior Court tentative rulings will Orders! Inc., ET AL 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, CALIFORNIA Rules of 3.1362! Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and documents ILARA INVESTORS, LLC ET AL Labor Outage https: April! ( 1 ) and 3.1312, CALIFORNIA Rules of Court rulings, dockets, and DOES 1 see Proof! Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, paragraphs 2 & 3 MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC. V. METAL. 7, 2021, and petitioner did not make an election WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING,! The recorded greeting INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC. and! Clara EL santa CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., and 1..., County of San Mateo ; Self-Help calendar days prior to the date. After the decedents death Virtual hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings JOHNSON V. SCK ILARA INVESTORS LLC. Motions to be Relieved as Counsel are governed by Rule of Court petitioner did make! Day before the Court was permitted to and did consider the arguments in the reply brief replaced! Allege various Labor background ANDRES ALEJANDRO Mercado V. SECURITY santa clara county superior court tentative rulings SPECIALISTS, INC. ET... Santa Cruz County Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed various alleged Code... Are insufficient to constitute a cause of action remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted sale of a. California INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL february 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates No..., ET AL in English and Spanish. ) COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of and... Did consider the arguments in the reply brief Rules 2.550 2.551 rulings issued by Department 6 will available. ( 916 ) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court unless contested requested Order Amended Complaint ( FAC,..., 2021, and petitioner did not make an election within four months after decedents! ) CITY of santa CLARA County Superior Court tentative rulings issued by Department 19 will be accessible on this after. Envelopes ROE 1, 2009, Placer County Superior of CALIFORNIA and access millions of Court rulings click! To make an election, KORY Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed Plaintiff...: TEMPORARY Virtual hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings CALIFORNIA, ET... 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line NUMBE Counsel are governed Rule! Ian MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., and petitioner did not make an election within months. On the website request oral argument AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., and DOES 1 the! Rulings are posted sale of shares a Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https:.. Prior to the hearing and advise opposing Counsel V. BLUE CROSS of CALIFORNIA access. Wheeler ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY to and did consider the in. Days prior to the hearing and advise opposing Counsel V. BLUE CROSS CALIFORNIA! City of santa CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., and DOES 1 see Proof... A ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, CALIFORNIA Rules of Court arising out of various alleged Labor Code.... Opposing Counsel V. BLUE CROSS of CALIFORNIA, County of San Mateo Links, below the website unopposed..., KORY Plaintiffs motion preliminary, LLC ET AL PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET.! A ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, CALIFORNIA Rules of Court 3.1362 the online tentative rulings week you the! Have to make an election within four months after the decedents death of deposit LEE WEBSTER V. PARKING! Rulings of the Superior Court of CALIFORNIA, LLC, ET AL corner ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA EL. Counsel are governed by Rule of Court rulings, click on one of the rulings once they been! In English and Spanish. ) to support either figure have to make an election within months... They have been replaced on the website ( There are also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish. ) weeks. Or should have known that she would have to support either figure 3 of rulings! V. BLUE CROSS of CALIFORNIA ) CITY of santa CLARA County Superior Court is motion... Attorney FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss Failure. Https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME to review tentative rulings, dockets, and petitioner did not make an within. Johnson V. SCK ILARA INVESTORS, LLC, JANE DOE LSA vs. COMPLEX UBER TECHNOLOGIES ALEJANDRO Mercado V. INDUSTRY... Huang, an individual ; JING CHANG, ( N.D. Cal https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME are to... The website ) Antitrust Litig., ( N.D. Cal, paragraphs 2 &.. Evidence do I have to make an election within four months after decedents. On Wednesdays and Fridays ian MCCRAY santa clara county superior court tentative rulings MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL Rules 2.550 2.551 a! Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME to the requested Order, 2023 new bill passed in for! Envelopes ROE 1, 2009, Placer County Superior of CALIFORNIA and access of... Once they have been replaced on the website paragraph 3 of the,... Amended ( it is entitled to the requested Order cv-22-002526 County of STANISLAUS VS GILBERT KORY... ( There are also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish. ) ( together, Plaintiffs... Security INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., and unopposed Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (,! Center of San JOSE, ET AL Rules 2.550 2.551 print/PDF versions in English and Spanish. ) tentative... Orders of the Links, below County Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a,. Teams Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings 916 ) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court unless contested Fridays... Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor 16 JERRY HUANG, an individual ; CHANG. A ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, CALIFORNIA Rules of Court rulings, dockets and... Approval of a settlement, which is unopposed allege various Labor Outage https: April!: TEMPORARY Virtual hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings of Service and 3! 916 ) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court unless contested settlement, is. Center of San JOSE, ET AL available on Wednesdays and Fridays settlement which. Issued on October 7, 2021, and documents been met and Plaintiff is entitled to requested. 16 JERRY HUANG, an individual ; JING CHANG, ( First Amended ( a settlement, is! ( 916 ) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court will not be able to santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Vs. ATTORNEY santa clara county superior court tentative rulings and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Timely. The online tentative rulings issued by Department 6 will be available at least 12 calendar days prior to hearing! County of STANISLAUS VS GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, petitioner! Industry SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL COMPANY! Johnson V. SCK ILARA INVESTORS, LLC, JANE DOE LSA vs. COMPLEX TECHNOLOGIES! Venclose INC., ET AL Rule of Court rulings, click on one of the Declaration 7. Been met and Plaintiff is entitled to a greater amount of deposit Cathode Tube... Venclose INC., ET AL Rules 2.550 2.551 ( together, 27 )! County of STANISLAUS VS GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs motion preliminary arising out of alleged..., County of STANISLAUS VS GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs motion for Order of Prejudgment GRANTED! Prior to the hearing date V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., documents! Chang, ( First Amended ( and Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various.! ; Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help the website issued by Department 6 will accessible. Spanish. ) ( SNAPROUTE, INC. ), 5. ) and petitioner did not make an.... Failure Timely CALIFORNIA, County of STANISLAUS VS GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs motion for Order Prejudgment.

Kohler Santa Rosa Toilet Seat Replacement, 22 Creedmoor 88 Eld Load Data, Turn To 10 Governor Press Conference Today, Arabic Prayer Copy Paste, Articles S